Which statement regarding advanced persistent threats (APTs) is true?

The statement that advanced persistent threats (APTs) typically originate from organized crime groups, activists, or governments accurately reflects the nature and motivation behind APTs. These attacks are characterized by their long-term, targeted nature, as well as the sophisticated techniques used to infiltrate a system and obtain sensitive information over an extended period.

APTs are often carried out by well-funded and organized groups that may have political, financial, or ideological motivations, making the origin of these threats significant. Organized crime groups might aim for financial gain, while state-sponsored actors could have espionage or sabotage objectives. Activists may target organizations to promote a cause. This complex landscape highlights the critical importance of recognizing the source of an APT as it shapes both the defensive strategies used to combat these threats and the incident response plans that organizations need to employ.

The other choices misrepresent the nature of APTs. They are not characterized by short-term attacks (contrary to the first option), they are inherently stealthy and hard to detect (making the third choice inaccurate), and they are not limited to mobile computing targets but often involve various systems and sectors beyond just mobile devices.